Category Archives: Women
Celebrating Roe
This piece was originally written by me for Ella’s Voice, a blog of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights.
This week we celebrate the 39th anniversary of Roe. V. Wade, the landmark decision by the Supreme Court to guarantee a woman’s right to privacy and the legalization of abortion. This decision dramatically changed the way women and families live their lives –for the better. It offers a safe and legal way for women to make decisions for themselves and their families based on need, access to resources and family planning. Women all over America are able to freely express their reproductive autonomy by choosing to have children, not have children and parent their children with dignity. While we are fortunate to live in a country where abortion and birth control are legal in all 50 states, there are policy makers and politically motivated movements who have prioritized controlling women’s access to reproductive health care – and our bodies.
In 2011 women’s bodies monopolized political debate as the right attempted to defund Title X facilities and strip reproductive healthcare access for millions of women nationwide. Congress pulled out all stops to slash funding for women’s reproductive services targeting Planned Parenthood and gunning for families with the greatest need. Fortunately anti-choicers and their political muses were unsuccessful, but 2012 is looking like another tough year for reproductive rights activists in the fight to secure and sustain access for women and families.
While it is important to highlight abortion as a key hot button issue this election year (and every year), we must also focus on the importance of contraception and access to other facets of reproductive health care. Last year pro-choice activists suffered a huge loss when Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Katherine Sebelius overruled a much-awaited decision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to make emergency contraception (EC) available over-the-counter (OTC) to women of all ages. More recently, some conservative candidates have taken a firm stance against contraception – one even stated “contraception is a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.” In addition five of this year’s Republican presidential hopefuls have signed personhood pledges, promising to acknowledge the “equal and unalienable rights” of zygotes while disregarding the free will and self-determination of fully formed women. Last November, Mississippi voters faced and defeated a ballot initiative that would have declared life begins at fertilization, making contraceptives like the IUD lethal weapons and we are certain to face even more threats to reproductive autonomy with the upcoming election.
For decades the sovereignty of women’s choices has been threatened by the irresponsible and self-interested conservative agendas of bible yielding, hypocritical tyrants whose quest for power leave women and families in precarious positions. Those on the margins, with access to the least resources including low-income women of color will suffer most from policy that restricts access to family planning. In 2012 we face restrictions on birth control and abortion, limited funding for reproductive health care including pap smears and mammograms and after all of this damage is done there will be no options for assistance to mother’s whose choices were limited by those who have no vested interest in their well-being. If women’s access continues to be a leading issue for the current Republican presidential field, pro-choice advocates are looking at another heavy year of advocacy and push-back and push-back we will give them!
It is my hope that we celebrate another 39 years of Roe v. Wade. Another 39 years of reproductive freedom for women and families who deserve tangible options for family planning and who can make their own decisions about when to have sex and when to have a family. We don’t need policy makers telling us how to make choices for ourselves, bodily integrity is one of the most important facets of human dignity – it should be that we are the governors of our own physical being. Here’s to another year of celebrating Roe, another year of freedom!
Making babies for Jesus

Some Republican presidental hopefuls believe that non-procreative sex is "counter to how things are supposed to be."
In 2011 women’s bodies monopolized political debate as the Right attempted to defund Title X facilities and strip reproductive healthcare access for millions of women nationwide. Congress pulled out all stops to slash funding for women’s reproductive services targeting Planned Parenthood and gunning for families with the greatest need. While anti-choicers and their political muses were unsuccessful (you’ve got to pray harder guys!), 2012 is looking like another tough year for reproductive rights activists in the fight to secure and sustain access for women and families.
To date, five Republican presidential hopefuls have signed personhood pledges. According to Personhoodusa.com “personhood is the cultural and legal recognition of the equal and unalienable rights of human beings.” And by human beings they mean zygotes – not fully formed women with free will and self-determination. If you do happen to see a zygote expressing these agents please contact that indistinct organization that names new species or the Guinness World Book of Records so they accurately document the most intelligent zygote ever. Last November, Mississippi voters faced and defeated a ballot initiative that would have declared life begins at fertilization, making contraceptives like the IUD lethal weapons. The proposition behind this bill is a wet dream for Republican hopeful Rick Santorum – though I imagine he harnesses his enthusiasm to avoid the mass murder of thousands of pre-human sperm.
Santorum’s ethics-driven campaign has prioritized restricting access to family planning resources and has taken a firm stance that contraception is not okay. He says, “a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”
Santorum even expresses his opposition to a law that struck down a ban on discussing or providing contraception to married couples and a right to privacy. He fears that sex is becoming “deconstructed to the point where it’s simply pleasure” and non-procreative sex and contraception are “important public policy issues” for a president. If you thought your government sanctioned marriage and sextracurricular activities were safe – think again! If you’re not making babies for Jesus you better push those beds apart!
Santorum’s platform is flaccid. His antiquated beliefs are dated, dangerous and provide no tangible options for sexually active Americans. In 2000 Santorum suggested young girls take a “virginity pledge” instead of receiving comprehensive sexual education in school. Without citing any sources for his data, Santorum claims “that adolescent girls who signed a virginity pledge were 40% less likely to have child out of wedlock than girls who did not sign a pledge.”
According to Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood President, “Republican women who support Planned Parenthood are very very disturbed about the extreme nature of the Republican primary, and wondering where they are going to go.”
But maybe we are getting this all wrong, maybe Santorum’s passion about restricting access to birth control, encouraging only pro-creative sex and stifling rights to privacy is all because he really cares about the state of impoverished women. When asked during an impromptu interview with Rachel Maddow if he really believed that the country would be better off if there was less contraception use, Santorum quoted a 2009 Brookings Institute study that said women could do three things to stay out of poverty: work, graduate from high school and get married without having a baby out of wedlock. This sounds vaguely familiar, like text from this one book – what’s is called? Ah yes, the Bible.
Singling out Santorum feels easy because he has been so honest about his intentions but other Republican hopefuls like Romney, Huckabee, Bachmann and Perry are also flying high on their moral crusades and as Richards so awesomely put it “trying to outdo themselves on who would be the worst president for women.”
If women’s access continues to be a leading issue for the current Republican presidential field, pro-choice advocates are looking at another heavy year of advocacy and pushback. Maybe, in another lifetime, when we all come back in our zygotic form, Santorum will sound more appealing. But until then, my bet is that women and those who support us will continue to fight for the right to use birth control and have sex simply for pleasure.
Debt ceiling pushes some graduate students to consider sex work
Originally posted at www.reproductivejusticeblog.org
Among the many aspects of the new Debt Ceiling Deal introduced by Congress on Tuesday, it will scrap subsidized student loans forcing graduate students to pay interest on the principle balance of their loans while enrolled in school.
What’s The Real Problem Regarding the Scapegoating of Immigrant Women?
To give some context to the lengthy history of anti-immigration reform against immigrant women, note that the result of the The Page Act, the first immigration law enacted by Congress, was the debasement of sex workers from Asia who participated in prostitution to feed their families. White westerners accused Chinese women of defiling the sanctity of marriage and monogamy in the U.S. and called for legislation banning Asian, immigrant women from entering the country. (No doubt the tarnishing of matrimonial holiness couldn’t be blamed on the righteous White man – Chinese women alone had to be responsible for the failing fidelity in U.S. marital culture.) Even though it was the male Chinese laborers “taking” jobs from White workers, it was somehow finagled that women were the root cause of economic and moral problems during the mid-19th century. Go figure.
A Gorgeous June Day in SF

With a few friends in town I took the opportunity to spend some time away from my computer/work and experience some parts of S.F. all over again. I have only been in the Bay for 10 months and while I love it here, finding time to “sight see” can be a task. Playing the tourist in your own city can be fun and a great way to make a case for the Bay when trying to get some long distance friends to relocate! I snapped some shots with my phone while we walked around. Check them out!

This city puts me in a NY state of mind minus the 3000 mile trek across country


Snapping some silly self-portraits w/ @pr3tty_links on our way tot he BART station


I was stopped by some local artists and asked to be a part of their music video! I “played” a little guitar, did some sangin’ & gave some fierce poses for the camera. They were amazing spirits and I felt humbled they felt the same about me. I look forward to seeing my Bay area music video debut on their website. Will share with you all once I find it.

I remember being about 12, when my dad drove us up to San Fran for the first time. My fondest memory was having clam chowder in a bread bowl. To this day Clam Chowder is my fav soup and what better way to eat it but on the pier in S.F. out of a sourdough bread bowl with salad and great conversation? #YUM

I’ve always dreamed of living on a house boat. Maybe one day …



For some people this may be a bit much but I thought it was f’ing fabulous! Naked cyclist riding through the streets of downtown S.F. Bold, playful and downright audacious. I thought this accurately exposed the fresh, autonomous spirit of Bay area folk. My friends were amused!

Another overweight, threatening, neck-rolling, weave slinging Black woman on TV … So what
Admittedly, I am not the ‘hippest’ when it comes to pop-culture. I don’t read the gossip magazines or have cable and as far as I know RHOA is an abbreviation from the periodic table. However, as a fan of alternative documentaries, I pay my $9.99/mo to Netflix for some nerdy late Friday night educational cinema. Feeling slighted by some tumultuous shit in my life over the last few months I have taken to a few lazy Sundays in bed watching shows that I promised to never subject myself to … Weeds … Grey’s Anatomy and this past weekend Season one of Glee.
Just like anyone else I love good show tunes. *insert spirit fingers* Glee made me feel like I was back in high school; I got sucked into the characters, remembering the emotional rollercoaster that was my teen years. Toward mid-season I started feeling something, something familiar and begrudging, and something uncomfortably frustrating. It hit me that the one Black female character, Mercedes was stereotypically casted as an overweight, threatening, neck-rolling, weave slinging back up singer.
I know what you’re thinking *que the violins* because everyone on this show is an “outcast” but if you think critically about the functions of Black women in pop-culture and how we’ve been isolated to the same kind of roles for years you’ll find that this particular role confirms a stereotype that we often fear. We’ve had this discussion time and time again – about how the image of black women is being misconstrued at the expense of entertaining television but how legitimate were my feelings? Were they warranted or was I just jumping on the bandwagon of critics who didn’t think decisively about what’s being depicted and the reality that depiction portrays?
This conversation could extend to a number of discussions dissecting the validity of a several characteristics but I will stick to just one. Over the last year I’ve had the opportunity to learn about a lot about movements I haven’t had a lot of experience in like the Fat Acceptance Movement (FA). This movement started in the 1960s and encourages a societal thought shift to end size discrimination. Knowing more about this movement I am less concerned with Mercedes image as it pertains to her weight but still wondering why two thirds of Black women on TV are depicted as what we would call obese. It’s because according to the Office of Minority Health, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 78 percent of Black women twenty years and older are obese with a BMI of 25 and above. If this is correct, if we accept that this organization is giving us accurate information, we could consciously accept that the number of Black women depicted on TV as obese, is as it should be – so why all the fuss?
Well, that depends on how you feel about your body and the labeling of your personal being as something that you may or may not accept. If you begrudge being called fat, overweight or obese and you identify with those words/ideas, personally not just because society says that’s what you are {though I fear the lines have become irreversibly blurred} then sure, you may feel vulnerable and angry when images of Black women who look like you appear time and time again on TV. However if you dismiss the irresponsible and careless way culture has put moral value {good/bad} on weight and size then the images of these women are not so bothersome.
Personally, I am learning to care less and less. Being self-aware to me means not taking it personal when it isn’t but it has the potential to be – if that makes sense. I recognize that Black women in America are sizably larger than their white counterparts and I recognize that pop-culture seems to accurately represent that. I don’t agree that that’s the only role Black women should play but we should appreciate that it’s not always a false depiction and it doesn’t have to be offensive because if we took more time to love ourselves as we exist we’d know that those images do not define us.
By the way … I <3 Mercedes
Black Girls Rock!!!
BET has teamed up with some phenomenal women of color to salute the lives of black women! With all-star performances by Keshia Cole, Jill Scott, Nia Long and Missy Elliot BGR is sure to set to tone for contemporary award shows.
The show airs November 7th at 8/7 Central on BET
Check out their website here!



















































